sreda, 18. maj 2011

Social Media in the Classroom


Searching for results on Google about social media in the classroom, I found a Youtube video about prof. Michael Wesch explaining his use of netwibes for educational purposes.
Being already impressed by prof. Wesch work after seeing his youtube video “Web 2.0 … The Machine is Us/ing Us” I thought it would be interesting to see how he combines new media and a very old science – ethnography.
The netvibes page was interesting to browse about and I was lucky to incidentally find a student blog by stevcoop sharing thoughts on education and posting a video about it.
Here is just a quick insight:

But honestly my thoughts about education and its methods, its format, its non/effectiveness, its future have exploded since I started the class. With the help of Dr. Wesch and all my fellow Diggies, I’ve been introduced to whole new ways of thinking about education, and I’ve been challenged (sometimes painfully so) in a lot of different ways. I’d always considered myself a bit of a traditionalist (whatever that means) when it came to education. I preferred (and in some cases still do prefer) the smell and feel of books, using notecards to organize research, listening to old-style lectures--the ones where a professor just stands and talks to you as one who knows so much about the material and is excited about it and talks about it almost as if it were a legend passed down over generations. And I used to prefer it almost begrudgingly over the "newer" kind of methods, with professors using PowerPoints and interactive Clicker quizzes/sessions and all these various kinds of online/computer assignments But I had never really asked myself why that was the case. At some base level it almost felt like the new digital technologies were edging-out the older forms, and sometimes I’d get a bit defensive about it. But over the last year, and especially over the last semester, I’ve realized that it’s not like that or about that at all. Books and notecards are, like computers and blogging and video-editing, just a form of technology. And yes they’re different and do different things—that’s a given. But the real issue at hand isn’t the technology, but rather the learning process. It’s more important to focus on trying to encourage the inquiry process and to help students get to the levels of procedural and constructed knowledge. It's more important to get students excited about and engaged in the material, to the point that they're even talking about it outside of class (without having that being forced upon them by homework or stress/fear over not doing well on the test). That’s really what needs to be reformed, far more than the infrastructure.


I find this post expresses it excellently – the changes or better the not-changes in education processes. Obviously the technologies in learning environments have changed significantly – compared to the education of my parents, when the most advanced technology was an overhead projector (and computers were the size of rooms) to my early student years with power point to advances in the class “New Media & Society” (exploring everything yet unknown to a new media illiterate).

The point stevcoop also highlights is: getting students excited about and engaged in the material. However, this can not be achieved only with new/newer technology as I learned from my own experience – students themselves should achieve at least the desire to want to learn. I regret all the wasted hours not paying enough attention or skipping class, because it was “boring”. Obviously it really was boring, but it was boring, because I didn’t know what to do with that particular knowledge back then – with the experience I have now (and having had to learn stuff twice instead of properly listening once) I learned to value all the “boring” classes. Even though back then (nearly nine years ago, since I started university) I never believed to say this, but for sure it is true: “There’s method in (t)his madness.“

Prof. Wesch posted another video on You Tube “A Vision of Students Today” – it deals with students and expresses the everyday dilemma of modern education – from participation in class to the relevance of the studies. The video is based on wiki document, edited by 200 students, who basically surveyed themselves.

Apparently, we can’t afford to ignore new technologies and new media, among others also social media, so we should learn to use them to our benefit. With the right knowledge on how to handle them, we can easily change the “entertaining” side of them into a “motivating” function, without the fear that the strict education is becoming “edutainment”.

torek, 17. maj 2011

torek, 10. maj 2011

Facebook is an US government spying tool?

The latest news around Julian Assange and Wikileaks is the headline story about Facebook being a spying tool.

As Assange said in his interview with Russia Today Facebook can easily yield to the pressure of US Government to hand over user information. Even Facebook users themselves are making voluntary work for the US intelligence by posting personal data and inviting friends to their social networks.

From Assange point of view Google, MSN, Yahoo and other major internet companies are a part of US intelligence network.

However according to Facebook spokesman Facebook doesn’t respond to pressure.
We don’t respond to pressure, we respond to compulsory legal process. There has never been a time we have been pressured to turn over data — we fight every time we believe the legal process is insufficient. The legal standards for compelling a company to turn over data are determined by the laws of the country, and we respect that standard.


Matthew Panzarino published in his blog post the document, showing what requests an investigation office has to fulfill in order to achieve Facebook user information. The information possible to aquire consists of:
User ID number
Email address
Date and Time of your account’s creation
The most recent logins, usually the last 2-3 days
Your phone number, if you registered it
Profile contact info
Mini-feed
Status update history
Shares
Notes
Wall posts
Friends list
Groups list
Future and past events
Videos
Photos
Private messages
IP logs (computers and locations you logged in from)

Just about everything you ever posted on Facebook.

Again the salient issue behind this is the privacy issue in online environment.
As Evans in his article “The Online Advertising Industry: Economics, Evolution and Privacy” states, the online audience can be divided into three major groups. First group is aware of the privacy issue and practices control over their private information – they either don’t use sites that insert “cookies” or they delete them on a regular basis. The second group consists of the ignorant users, who don’t know that private information on them is being gathered, and finally the third group consists of users who agree with information gathering.

The privacy issue is a thin line. Sometimes we cross it voluntarily, sometimes a third party intrudes in our lives. However, it is not a new concept that, what one wishes to keep private, one should not write down.

Resources:
Matthew Panzarino (2.5.2011) http://thenextweb.com/facebook/2011/05/02/heres-what-happens-when-the-police-subpoena-your-facebook/
Brad McCarty (3.5.2011) http://thenextweb.com/facebook/2011/05/03/facebook-fires-back-at-assange-we-dont-respond-to-pressure/
Matt Brian (1.5.2011)http://thenextweb.com/facebook/2011/05/02/wikileaks-founder-facebook-is-the-most-appalling-spy-machine-that-has-ever-been-invented/
Kashmir Hill (3.5.2011) http://blogs.forbes.com/kashmirhill/2011/05/03/facebook-responds-to-julian-assanges-spying-machine-allegations/
Nina Mandell (2.5.2011) http://articles.nydailynews.com/2011-05-02/news/29521537_1_julian-assange-facebook-users-facebook-spokesman
David S. Evans (2009). The Online Advertising Industry: Economics, Evolution, and Privacy. Journal of Economic Perspectives. Accessed at SSRN http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1376607

sreda, 4. maj 2011

Data breach

One of the more sensitive objects in everyday life is dealing with credit cards. Many have heard of (or even experienced) a credit card fraud, but usually in connection with ATMs.

Recently there has been a massive internet data breach at Sony’s. Around 77 million of personal information has been stolen. There is no evidence that credit card data had been taken, however the not encrypted personal information (name, date of birth, etc.) could have been exposed to a potentially dangerous third party. Many have ignored the fact that FB users (and other social network users) make personal information publically accessible willingly making internet data breach unnecesaary.

Regarding from the corporate communication angle, Sony responded correctly (although a little bit late) and made the occurrence public. In many cases goes the internet crime by unnoticed, because victims are scared of public embarrassment.
Certainly Sony had gone through a dilemma of either informing its customers or not – personally I think they made a good decision in going public. Their customers will be more aware of possible scams and will know how to react.

Although Sony has been exposed to public embarrassment, they managed to keep at least some trust of their customers, although many of them feel reluctant to give away their credit card details in the future.

Personally I don’t use the credit card much or often, I also don’t store much money on it as I only use it on special occasions – shopping on trusted internet pages or travelling. But one can not avoid dealing with credit cards nowadays, so how to protect oneself in times when online shopping is a everyday occurrence?

Scambusters created 21 tips to help you avoid inconveniences regarding credit card crime.

Be vigilant, be safe.